Ministry re-tweeting
There seems to be a couple to types of people I encounter on the internet - tweeters and re-tweeters.
Creators of content (tweeters) and replicators of content (re-tweeters).
Both serve a function and have a place. I will be honest however, I do not care to much about reading the re-tweeters re-tweets.
Re-tweeting is rather safe to do and involves little engagement with the re-tweet. Most of the time when I re-tweet I just post what I am re-tweeting without any context as to why I am doing so. "Hey! Here is a quote I found. Re-tweeted by a person."
Re-tweeting is not a bad thing at all. It however is not the same as tweeting.
When you tweet you create something new and put yourself out there. You have to give some context as to what you are doing or why you are tweeting it. You have to share something about yourself and be expose to criticism. When we only re-tweet we have the ability to hide behind it and no one is sure if we agree, disagree with the re-tweet. No one knows if a re-tweeted comment is meant to be a joke or serious.
Many of us clergy in my beloved denomination might be described as ministry re-tweeters. We say we want to do different ministry or creative or innovate ministry, but this is a code for something else. Most of the time clergy want an different/creative/innovative ministry that someone else has somewhere else but no one is doing it here. For instance, I ministry re-tweeted the Fort Worth Dish Out.
A ministry re-tweet is not bad, it just is much safer and puts the clergy at a safe distance from the failure or success of the ministry.
What the UMC is perhaps missing are clergy and laity who are ministry tweeters. The ones who are creating content/ministry. The ones being vulnerable, exposed and opening themselves up to failure and even, dare it be stated, shame. I am currently working on a couple of ministry tweets: Jubilee Bank (a micro-finance for the working poor in Fort Worth Texas using the connectionalism of the UMC) and Five Thousand Words (which first incomplete draft can be found here).
Others can account to the amount of ministry tweeting and re-tweeting I participate in, but the UMC might be a fruitful place if we were to find a balance between ministry tweeting and re-tweeting.
Creators of content (tweeters) and replicators of content (re-tweeters).
Both serve a function and have a place. I will be honest however, I do not care to much about reading the re-tweeters re-tweets.
 |
| Re-tweeting picture :) |
Re-tweeting is not a bad thing at all. It however is not the same as tweeting.
When you tweet you create something new and put yourself out there. You have to give some context as to what you are doing or why you are tweeting it. You have to share something about yourself and be expose to criticism. When we only re-tweet we have the ability to hide behind it and no one is sure if we agree, disagree with the re-tweet. No one knows if a re-tweeted comment is meant to be a joke or serious.
Many of us clergy in my beloved denomination might be described as ministry re-tweeters. We say we want to do different ministry or creative or innovate ministry, but this is a code for something else. Most of the time clergy want an different/creative/innovative ministry that someone else has somewhere else but no one is doing it here. For instance, I ministry re-tweeted the Fort Worth Dish Out.
A ministry re-tweet is not bad, it just is much safer and puts the clergy at a safe distance from the failure or success of the ministry.
 |
| tweeting pictures :) |
Others can account to the amount of ministry tweeting and re-tweeting I participate in, but the UMC might be a fruitful place if we were to find a balance between ministry tweeting and re-tweeting.
Are we Christians really monotheistic? Part 3
If we live our lives thinking there are multiple gods (such as the "god of anger") yet we worship only one God (such as Jesus) then we are not really monotheistic oriented. Rather we are henotheistic or monolatristic.
If we Christians are moving in our lives believing there are somethings (or some gods) which are good (say love) and some things(gods) that are bad (say hate) then we are forgetting that God declared all things good.
If we declare somethings good and somethings bad then we will live out our lives attempting to remove the bad while seek after the good. So we begin to worship the "good" gods and demonize the "bad" gods.
Again, not a posture of monotheism.
While practical and popular, the question, "Is this good or bad?" is not a question for Christian monotheism. We already know the answer. All things are good as declared by God.
If we are asking if something is good or bad then we are really, at our core, practicing something other than monotheism of Christianity.
Christian monotheism rather accepts that all things are created by one God and that one God called all things good. As such we do not waste time considering if something is bad and therefore should be avoided or good and therefore should be attained. The question Christian monotheism asks is, "Is this redeemed or does it need to be redeemed?"
This question changes our posture in the world.
If we think that hate is bad and should be avoided then we are forgetting that Christian monotheism calls us to hate things like slavery and injustice. If we think that drug use is bad then we will avoid it as well as those who are victims of drugs. Rather if we see drug use as something that needs to be redeemed then we will sit with and seek out help for those who are addicts.
If we live in a world of good and bad then we will not engage the bad parts of the world and therefore the world does not change. Additionally, when we think something is bad we deny the power that is inherent in that thing (such as the power of hating injustice).
Rather, if we live in a world that is redeemed or in need of redemption then we will enter into the dark places of the world and work for change. Additionally, when we see something as in need of redemption then we are able to utilize the inherent power in that thing in order to help redeem it. Can you imagine a world that is so full of hate of slavery that no one would allow anyone to become enslaved in human trafficking?
So, I join all my Christian brothers and sisters who claim monotheism to change from asking, "Is this good or bad?" to "Is this redeemed or in need or redemption?".
If we Christians are moving in our lives believing there are somethings (or some gods) which are good (say love) and some things(gods) that are bad (say hate) then we are forgetting that God declared all things good.
If we declare somethings good and somethings bad then we will live out our lives attempting to remove the bad while seek after the good. So we begin to worship the "good" gods and demonize the "bad" gods.
Again, not a posture of monotheism.
While practical and popular, the question, "Is this good or bad?" is not a question for Christian monotheism. We already know the answer. All things are good as declared by God.
If we are asking if something is good or bad then we are really, at our core, practicing something other than monotheism of Christianity.
Christian monotheism rather accepts that all things are created by one God and that one God called all things good. As such we do not waste time considering if something is bad and therefore should be avoided or good and therefore should be attained. The question Christian monotheism asks is, "Is this redeemed or does it need to be redeemed?"
This question changes our posture in the world.
If we think that hate is bad and should be avoided then we are forgetting that Christian monotheism calls us to hate things like slavery and injustice. If we think that drug use is bad then we will avoid it as well as those who are victims of drugs. Rather if we see drug use as something that needs to be redeemed then we will sit with and seek out help for those who are addicts.
If we live in a world of good and bad then we will not engage the bad parts of the world and therefore the world does not change. Additionally, when we think something is bad we deny the power that is inherent in that thing (such as the power of hating injustice).
Rather, if we live in a world that is redeemed or in need of redemption then we will enter into the dark places of the world and work for change. Additionally, when we see something as in need of redemption then we are able to utilize the inherent power in that thing in order to help redeem it. Can you imagine a world that is so full of hate of slavery that no one would allow anyone to become enslaved in human trafficking?
So, I join all my Christian brothers and sisters who claim monotheism to change from asking, "Is this good or bad?" to "Is this redeemed or in need or redemption?".
| Somethings are difficult to redeem. :) |
Are we Christians really monotheistic? Part 2
The previous post just briefly pointed out that when one thinks there are other gods in the world then monotheism is called into question. Additionally, it was pointed out, that many of us live as though we do think there are other gods in the world (such as the god of pride or the god the money), and as such perhaps many of us Christians operate not out of montheism but out of henotheism or monolatry.
When we orient our lives around the idea that there are other gods in the world, then we can quickly judge these different gods as either good or bad.
The god of love - good.
The god of hate - bad.
The god of pride - bad.
The god of peace - good.
Once we have judged for ourselves that which is good and that which is bad, we then desire to live our lives out of desiring the good while avoiding the bad.
The little hiccup in our plan however is that as a Christian we understand that God made all things and called them good. So how then can we go though life calling bad what God called good?
Even Jesus did not like being called good when he was identified as a "good teacher".
When we go through life judging for ourselves what is good and what is bad we can find ourselves building a bubble around our lives, insulating us from reality.
We begin to see some people as good and others as bad. We begin to see some ideas as good and some as bad.
When we create a good/bad world (dualism) then we can find ourselves no longer able or willing to help transform the world.
Why would I want to hang out with the "bad" people or read about the "bad" ideas or practice "bad" habits?
When we live in a world which we proclaim good and bad on things which God has called Good, then we live in a world which is not oriented toward monotheism.
The next post if the final of this installment and will (hopefully) be the answer to the question, "so what?"
When we orient our lives around the idea that there are other gods in the world, then we can quickly judge these different gods as either good or bad.
The god of hate - bad.
The god of pride - bad.
The god of peace - good.
Once we have judged for ourselves that which is good and that which is bad, we then desire to live our lives out of desiring the good while avoiding the bad.
The little hiccup in our plan however is that as a Christian we understand that God made all things and called them good. So how then can we go though life calling bad what God called good?
Even Jesus did not like being called good when he was identified as a "good teacher".
When we go through life judging for ourselves what is good and what is bad we can find ourselves building a bubble around our lives, insulating us from reality.
We begin to see some people as good and others as bad. We begin to see some ideas as good and some as bad.
When we create a good/bad world (dualism) then we can find ourselves no longer able or willing to help transform the world.
Why would I want to hang out with the "bad" people or read about the "bad" ideas or practice "bad" habits?
When we live in a world which we proclaim good and bad on things which God has called Good, then we live in a world which is not oriented toward monotheism.
The next post if the final of this installment and will (hopefully) be the answer to the question, "so what?"
Be the change by Jason Valendy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.