Man bites dog...
"Be careful. People like to be told what they already know. Remember that. They get uncomfortable when you tell them new things. New things... well, new things aren't what they expect. They like to know that, say, a dog will bite a man. That is what dogs do. They don't want to know that man bites dog, because the world is not supposed to happen like that. In short, what people think they want is news, but what they really crave is olds . . . Not news but olds, telling people that what they think they already know is true. "
—Terry Pratchett, through the character Lord Vetinari from his "The Truth" a Novel of Disworld.
This might help explain why so many people can become offended by alternate theologies.
—Terry Pratchett, through the character Lord Vetinari from his "The Truth" a Novel of Disworld.
This might help explain why so many people can become offended by alternate theologies.
Open Source Continuing Education
Another idea I have been working on as a way to encourage clergy to continue in education while also keeping costs down and using the collective expertise/wisdom of the clergy community of the Central Texas Conference.
You can read the beginning proposal of Open Source Class (a working name) here.
My friend Sarah commented that this idea might work (with modifications) for staff development not just at churches but in any organization.
You can read the beginning proposal of Open Source Class (a working name) here.
My friend Sarah commented that this idea might work (with modifications) for staff development not just at churches but in any organization.
Stewardship as a symptom?
In the fall, many churches embark on a stewardship campaign.
These campaigns are well and good. There is nothing wrong with getting people to talk about money and pledging and responsible giving - especially in these times of finances being what they are.
However, I wonder (in the back of my mind) if we in the church is focusing on the wrong "ship" when we take a month out of the year to discuss stewardship. There is a parable:
A woman is sitting on the river bank. The woman notices that someone in the river who is caught in the current and cannot swim. Jumping into the water she swims out and pulls the drowning man ashore. She looks again to see another drowning man. Aain, she swims out and pulls him ashore. After several minutes the woman sees another man in the river, and another and another. She rallies the men that she saved to help her pull others out, but there are too many people in the river who are fighting to stay afloat in the current.
Stewardship campaigns can feel like we are jumping in to save the ministries that are struggling to stay afloat. We all jump in and pool our resources and energies to ensure that the ministries survive. We hear from people who have been saving jumping into the river and helping save ministries for years share their stories. And each year we expect that we will get more and more people ashore to help ensure that we do not run out of people on shore to help rescue the drowning.
The thing about stewardship campaigns is that we reinforce the need for people to come ashore to save the drowning. We all feel that the stewardship campaign is important and cannot see why we would not stop. Saving the drowning feels really good.
But I did not share the end of the parable:
After some time, the woman decides to stop jumping into the river and saving people. Everyone is curious to know why the original hero stops saving people.
"Where are you going?! We need you to help us pull people from the river! Don't you see these people are drowning!?" the crowd shouts.
She replies, "I am going to go upstream and stop people from jumping into the river."
What would it look like to place less emphasis on stewardship (rescuing the drowning) and focus on stopping people from jumping into the river in the first place?
I think it would look like a Church that understands stewardship is important but it there is a more important "ship".
If we focus on discipleship first and foremost, I wonder if stewardship takes care of itself. If we focus on discipleship, I wonder if worship takes care of itself? If we focus on stewardship then are we just treating a symptom, much like pulling people from a river, rather than addressing the source of the symptom?
These campaigns are well and good. There is nothing wrong with getting people to talk about money and pledging and responsible giving - especially in these times of finances being what they are.
However, I wonder (in the back of my mind) if we in the church is focusing on the wrong "ship" when we take a month out of the year to discuss stewardship. There is a parable:
A woman is sitting on the river bank. The woman notices that someone in the river who is caught in the current and cannot swim. Jumping into the water she swims out and pulls the drowning man ashore. She looks again to see another drowning man. Aain, she swims out and pulls him ashore. After several minutes the woman sees another man in the river, and another and another. She rallies the men that she saved to help her pull others out, but there are too many people in the river who are fighting to stay afloat in the current.
Stewardship campaigns can feel like we are jumping in to save the ministries that are struggling to stay afloat. We all jump in and pool our resources and energies to ensure that the ministries survive. We hear from people who have been saving jumping into the river and helping save ministries for years share their stories. And each year we expect that we will get more and more people ashore to help ensure that we do not run out of people on shore to help rescue the drowning.
The thing about stewardship campaigns is that we reinforce the need for people to come ashore to save the drowning. We all feel that the stewardship campaign is important and cannot see why we would not stop. Saving the drowning feels really good.
But I did not share the end of the parable:
After some time, the woman decides to stop jumping into the river and saving people. Everyone is curious to know why the original hero stops saving people.
"Where are you going?! We need you to help us pull people from the river! Don't you see these people are drowning!?" the crowd shouts.
She replies, "I am going to go upstream and stop people from jumping into the river."
What would it look like to place less emphasis on stewardship (rescuing the drowning) and focus on stopping people from jumping into the river in the first place?
I think it would look like a Church that understands stewardship is important but it there is a more important "ship".
If we focus on discipleship first and foremost, I wonder if stewardship takes care of itself. If we focus on discipleship, I wonder if worship takes care of itself? If we focus on stewardship then are we just treating a symptom, much like pulling people from a river, rather than addressing the source of the symptom?

Be the change by Jason Valendy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

